• About

burningmanagementblog

~ Life imitates management..management imitates life

burningmanagementblog

Monthly Archives: March 2016

Mystics and Statistics on the Gut

23 Wednesday Mar 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Alice Bowman, Barry Marshall, Build Fitness, Caroline Myss, Challenger, Desperdaos Under the Eaves, Godstein, gut, hpylori, Jeffrey Pfeffer, mystics and statistics, NASA, New Horizons, Richard Branson, Robin Warren, Scientific American, Space Shuttle, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Warren Zevon, wholehearted you

1211-second-brain

One of my favourite artists of all time is the barely-known but hugely talented singer songwriter Warren Zevon. He’s a great wordsmith and this snippet from my favourite song of his, Desperados Under the Eaves, is testament to that:

“And if California slides into the ocean,

Like the mystics and statistics say it will,

I predict this motel will be standing

Until I pay my bill”.

 I’ve always loved that line ‘mystics and statistics’ because spinning on the head of that particular pin is one of the great divides of nations, society and management. It’s classic God versus science or put in management speak, measurement versus intuition. Today more than ever we seem polarised in this domain with heavyweights pulled into opposing corners. It doesn’t have to be thus.

alice_bowman_0.png

Given Easter is upon us I thought it might be interesting to explore matters that go beyond the merely physical. Recently at a Business Summit in Sydney, respected NASA scientist Alice Bowman spoke about how she manages a large team that is delivering the New Horizons space project; the one that did the Pluto flyby. She blew a few myths into outer space at the same time. The idea of the extrovert, charismatic and somewhat arrogant is now regarded as passé given that hyper-connected networks triumph over hierarchies. What was really important about what Bowman discussed was the fact that a blend of both science and the arts were what made her a better leader. Furthermore she indicated that the development and use of intuition is an important aspect of her leadership style and the delivery of her aggressively scientific project. She said

“A lot of the problems I encounter leading, I address intuitively. What I think it is, it’s allowing yourself, in the workplace, to also have that emotional side, not just have that technical skills. Once I accepted that I have this other side of me, I became much more calm, because I didn’t feel like I was fighting that part of me. So I guess it gets back to that – know yourself. When you’re leading, you’re in tough situations, and you want to draw on all those strengths that you have, some of those are on the emotional side. “
Pretty heady stuff coming from a rocket scientist. I like it though. I did both art and science at University in the belief that a well-rounded education required engagement of both hemispheres of the brain. Economics, accounting, statistics, chemistry, epidemiology, psychology are all science and evidence based. However I also reckoned that ideas imagination and creativity are essential elements to have as well so I did Shakespeare, political science, film studies and literature. Some days I was reading sonnets in the morning and dissecting cats in the zoo lab in the afternoon. It seemed somewhat schizophrenic at the time but now it makes total sense. Perhaps it was my intuition at play that guided me to take that particular academic path.

1336565411_865

One of my favourite management writers is Jeffrey Pfeffer, Professor of Organisational Behaviour at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business. I’ve been a fan since reading Power in Organisations which was a real eye opener for me. His most recent book, co-authored with fellow faculty member Robert Sutton is entitled Hard Facts, Dangerous Half Truths and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management. It’s a catchy title to be sure, if not a tad verbose! In it Pfeffer argues that every company needs evidence based management. I can’t argue that. What Pfeffer though doesn’t factor in is intuition. He believes that evidence-based measurement is the key to business success or more correctly a way to avoid business failure. The problem here is the unyielding belief in the science that lies behind measurement. Data does not provide the total solution. While at business school in the US I led a management simulation team competing with a number of others. It was based on a racing team scenario and we analysed data to determine whether we should compete in the last race of the season with the risk of blowing an engine if we did or losing a sponsor if we didn’t. Getting knee-deep in the data we plumped under my inspiring leadership to race. I, with others, was devastated to find that it wasn’t actually about a racing team but rather the data given to the NASA team that sent the crew of the doomed space shuttle Challenger to their deaths. Sobering indeed.

The strength and flaw of science, of course, is its reliance on being exact. To publish scientific results in a peer reviewed journal you need the appropriate experimental design and results need to be repeatable. The findings need to stand up to scrutiny from the rest of the scientific community, hence where the peer reviewed journal comes in. Quite often the findings become the new understanding despite poor design, the incorrect measurement or statistical tools and inadequate sample size. At other times those who have made discoveries that fly in the face of received scientific wisdom get hammered by their colleagues in the field. A perfect example of this, which involved two Australians, was the discovery in 1982 by Barry Marshall and Robin Warren that a bacteria (helicobacter pylori) and not stress and bad diet cause ulcers. I was around at the time working in hospitals and my gastroenterological colleagues were pretty scathing of the notion. A Nobel Prize each and the rest is history. Prior to that science stated quite adamantly that in no way was a bacterium to blame.

Those of a more intuitive bent have known about the importance of the gut for centuries. In fact in the area of our stomach/intestines we are reaching something of a nexus – where art and science are beginning to converge. To put it another way, science is beginning to catch up. Latest thinking is that mental illness may well originate as a bacteria in the gut. The gut is becoming recognised as the second brain. The Scientific American no less (May 1, 2015) describes a ‘superhighway between the brain and GI system that holds great sway over humans.’ This superhighway is known as the enteric nervous system and it connects to the brain though hundreds of millions of neurons. In fact the gut is so smart it can operate independently of the brain. It needs this brain scientists think because it has to listen to the trillions of microbes contained therein. There are estimated to be ten times as many bacteria in your GI system than cells in the human body.

So when we say we get butterflies in our stomach when we feel nervous or get a gut instinct this is no longer the stuff of ‘old wives tales’ but fast becoming scientifically mainstream. The gut has a huge impact on our mood as well. Scientists estimate that 90% of serotonin is produced in the gut. Serotonin is probably the best-known brain chemical for influencing our emotions and behaviour.

Richard Branson is often quoted as saying ‘I rely far more on gut instinct than researching huge amounts of statistics.’ And you can’t argue against the enduring nature of Branson’s success. There are those like Caroline Myss who believe intuition isn’t something that can or necessarily should be trained and practiced. I for one do not agree. The fixation we have had with numbers and analysis has meant that we have pushed this sense of self and intuition to the background. We respond to intuition all the time but we don’t know it. It’s a higher level function. It’s organic and we don’t think about it; a bit like our olfactory function – we don’t realise we smell something we just do. It’s a side of ourselves we have to bring forward, nurture and begin to acknowledge as a powerful tool for transformation and managing complex situations and complex personalities.

science-vs-religion

This consideration of the ‘Godstein’ (spirit and science as one) paradox is also apposite this week as we launched our 24/7 gymnasium (Build Fitness) at work. It’s just not any ordinary gym, it is about an opportunity for our staff and tenant’s staff to get fit and explore the possibility of whole-heartedness. Build Fitness has a strapline which is ‘whole-hearted- you.’ Rather than just concentrate on the factually-oriented scientific notion of fitness (though lord knows theories on what constitutes a good diet and good exercise seem to change by the month) we are gingerly treading into the areas of body, mind, spirit, heart and self. It’s long been known – since Maslow anyway that there are other elements at play that are important and to achieve self-actualisation a mere concentration on physical well-being is not going to set you there. Here’s what I wrote to explain the WHY question on our website (buildfitness.me) for those wishing to use our facility.

UNC-COM CTC Gym Logo with strap 270116

Body

Physical well-being is a logical place to start. Many of us on the CTC Precinct live sedentary lives. Worse than this our out of work activities have also taken on a distinctly sedentary flavour e.g. sitting and watching Foxtel and Netflix. Our weekend of sport these days might well be watching it on telly. There is increasing evidence that sitting for prolonged periods has a very detrimental effect on long-term health outcomes. This can be ameliorated by physical activity but the use of a gym may not be that attractive when we just want to get home at the end of a busy day. At some stage in the future it is likely that employers, deemed to know of the health risks of sedentary work, will be asked to justify why claims should not be made against them for doing more to avoid premature death of their workforce or retired workforce. The issue of asbestos exposure in the workplace many years ago may well be ‘sitting exposure’ in the 2000s. Sitting as they say is ‘the new sugar’.

With a 24/7 gym available at work employers will be able to say that their employees were given the opportunity to avail themselves of facilities that are recognised as being the perfect antidote to an unhealthy work environment. At CTC we provide a collaborative leasing model and enable our tenants to feel part of a bigger whole. In the same way as the Café can be regarded as a facility that they our tenants make available to their staff so too is the gym a facility for all CTC Precinct employees. Harvard School of Public Health now believes that healthier people are happier and as a result are healthier. It is a continual feedback mechanism. Happier people will suffer fewer colds and less heart disease as a result. What better gift to give your workforce than fewer colds and less chronic heart disease!

Heart

When we think of fitness the heart is often what we think of first and it is true that Build Fitness does have a good range of cardio equipment to get the heart racing. We are also including other aids to assist in getting a good view of your heart health like charts and a blood pressure monitor. A heart rate monitor will be available in the centre for those who wish to monitor their heart during some of their exercise program.

Heart, of course, has other meanings including the centre and courage, determination or hope. Each has an applicable meaning for what we are trying to do with Build Fitness. The gym is likely to become somewhat of a hub or centre within the Precinct with those involved with it showing determination (and in my case at least) hope in improving our physical and mental well-being. Heart is lastly about love and love of self and self-image are all issues that are important with respect to physical and mental wellness.

Mind

Mental health is a very important concern for those running organisations. Under workplace health and safety legislation employers, as Persons Conducting a Business or Undertaking (PCBU), have a statutory duty to ensure that their workplaces do not cause mental health issues. Employee Assistance 9EA) schemes are one thing but in terms of duty of care employers will be asked to demonstrate that they had a culture that encouraged both physical and mental well-being. The gym has a role to play here as well. There is a now a great body of research that says that exercise is good for mental health. Exercise has been shown in studies to improve memory of complex stimuli. Exercise is critical to handling stress; a key exacerbator of mental strain and illness. When we get stressed two potentially harmful (and in some circumstances life-saving) chemicals are produced being cortisol and adrenalin. While the rewarding chemicals that make us all feel good (e.g. dopamine that we get from exercise) have a half-life of around 3 hours adrenaline and cortisol hang around for 22 hours. We have to work much harder to get their effects out of our system. High levels of cortisol on brain function have deleterious effects long-term. Dr Wendy Suzuki who studies brain function at NYU says that high levels of cortisol in the brain accelerates the aging process and reduces memory function. The impact on the pre-frontal cortex is such that it affects our ability to plan, make decisions and engage in flexible thinking; all important skills we require in our workforce.

Long-term chronic stress affects the brain. If your staff is suffering stress there is a duty of care to know about it and to have in place a range of measures that can help the employee confront it and get it under control. The old adage of ‘suck it up’ is no longer defensible.

There is another consideration to stress in the workplace and that it is contagious. There is a belief in neuroscience that says ‘I stress, you stress, we stress.’ This sheets itself straight back to efficiency and productivity. A recent study by St Louis University found that ‘second-hand’ stress is very real and can be passed on through things like tone of voice, facial expressions, posture and even odour. Renowned healthcare researcher the Mayo Clinic advise that stress can be addressed through exercise. It is as they say ‘meditation in motion’. Spirit/Soul

This can be a problematic one because it gets confused with religion and that is not what we are talking about in terms of spirit. Here we can ascribe two meanings. Spirit is about the way in which you do things e.g. in a positive spirit. A positive spirit comes from a positive mind-frame and this is definitely made easier by being physically healthy. Spirit is also that inner feeling of peace or calmness. It is the inner yearning and quite often what makes us want to improve or transform in terms of our careers, our abundance and our relationships our lives. Renowned neuroscientist Deepak Chopra believes that soul is an important aspect in everyday life but particularly in the world of work. He believes that leadership, an attribute many of us must bring to bear in the witness of our daily work-life, requires soul.

Supporting our Build Fitness approach is an initiative we are calling Alert@Work. This will require all CTC staff undergoing mindfulness training with the aim of ensuring we can be in the moment, less distracted by the ever increasing distractions of the modern workplace e.g. open plan offices, endless emails, texts, tweets on Twitter etc. Being situationally aware which is one of the key aims of our mindfulness training arising from meditation will improve the delivery of services to our customers and make the Precinct a safer place. Increasingly large and credible organisations are looking to mindfulness to give hem that extra edge in service delivery and profitability. All CTC staff have undergone emotional intelligence (EI) training to provide deeper insights into the way we interact. Neuroscience, EI, mindfulness and different ways of looking at creativity and leadership are all now becoming the new ‘black’ in the world of management. Many of these aspects touch on spirit and soul and it is down to the individual to what extent, if at all, they wish to indulge in such matters. Build Fitness, especially through the website (http://www.buildfitness.me/) will explore some of the traditional and emerging philosophies that might create a pathway for those interested in exploring the transformational possibilities of such modalities.

 Self

Self-image is a very critical component of our mental health. Our self-worth is often linked to self- image and this can be recalibrated through seeing improvements in one’s physical appearance. It’s no surprise that we looked hard to find ‘friendly’ mirrors to help those in training feel good about the journey they are on. Self is the whole package and it is where the mind body and soul reside as one. Some say people glow when they feel good about themselves and pregnant women are a prime example of this. Others see auras around people. This is merely the physical energy given off by people who have fabulous self-esteem who are self-assured and selfless. Without doubt the focus on self is the opposite of narcissism and more about improvement. The narcissists love themselves because of their faults. The self-assured love themselves despite their faults.

Easter is a great time to celebrate re-birth and transformation, no matter your religious beliefs or lack thereof. In the Northern hemisphere it is closely associated with spring and for us in Queensland it celebrates the arrival of autumn – our most pleasant season. And ‘praise the lord’ because with climate change our temperatures and humidity this summer have been higher than ever and we’ve all had a gut-full of that!

 

Like a Sturgeon – Trumped for the Very First Time

17 Thursday Mar 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amercian Express, AMEX, authenticity, caviar, Donald Trump, followership, GOP, humility, I'm Crazy for You, insight, Leadership, Like a Virgin, listening, Madonna, Marco Rubio, Papa Don't Preach, vulnerability

11951929_10153603954729402_5401036763861155580_n

You guessed it; I was at the Madonna Concert last night that is quickly becoming legend for the late arrival of the pop diva. Notified by the event management we arrived ‘fashionably late’ at 8.45 all geared up for the announced 9pm start. As it was, that meant a 12pm finish and a late (or should I say early) repose. Madonna graced us with her presence at a few minutes before 11.30pm and my head hit the pillow at 2.30am, pretty much blowing my productivity the day after and making me somewhat of a hazard driving home from work on a pretty meagre zzzz diet.

So there were two and three quarter hours we had to while away. Thanks to American Express this wasn’t as onerous as it might have been. Indeed, had it not been for access to the American Express cardholders lounge at the Brisbane Entertainment Centre, we probably would have baled out before the concert started (like some people I know) throwing the $299 per ticket in the trash. So at a time when one person trashed their own brand – Madonna, another organisation – Amex once again stood out as a company that gets what it means to delight their customer.

Madonna on the other hand doesn’t seem to give a damn, or as she might more aptly call it ..a f*@k. It was a concert ridiculously punctuated with expletive ridden monologues which were Madonna’s forlorn endeavour to come across as some sort of freedom fighter, social evangelist and all round rebel with a cause. It didn’t work. The audience were treated to what amounted to no more than a cringe laden, school-girl giggly clichéd series of sexual innuendo (ooohh in your end Oh – you get the picture). The way she treated her two main protagonist dancers, both black, was heavy in racial stereo-typing and the production of a banana from the waist coat of one of them was to me offensive. Still it’s Madonna and she can get away with that, after all she is a freedom fighter right?

That made me ponder. Does anyone in her entourage vet this stuff and call it for what it is, or does she have a sycophantic coterie that tell her exactly what she wants to hear? Madonna, it appears to me, puts herself in the rarefied air of someone so special that she affords herself a license that few others would be given. She is the caviar of the music world – a multi-million selling recording artist who has successfully traversed the vagaries of musical trends across four decades. Amazing given she is actually a child of the 1950s. This seems to afford her certain rights not available to us mere mortals.

While spending time in the Amex lounge I went on Twitter and caught up with the day’s events which was pretty much dominated by the US Primaries. There were numerous news organisations reporting on the recent wins by Trump progressing him further and further towards winning the GOP nomination. What characterises Trump’s campaign is a kind of aggression that appears to appeal to a certain segment of the US population. This in turn is causing riotous behaviour at the various rallies associated with Trump. Trump has quite often suggested that someone should be punched in the face and on more than one occasion his ‘disciples’ have followed through on this. Why wouldn’t they? Here is a leader, possibly soon to be the most powerful person in the world, advocating a behaviour that they are only too willing to carry out if it is given sanction.

Leadership requires many things. We often describe it as the ability to take people with you, as well as persuade many to your particular point of view. Quite often successful leaders don’t make good leaders if success is defined by the size of the following you garner. Hitler after all had much of the German nation in his thrall but that did not make him a good leader. Madonna in her own way is a leader. She has influenced many generations of women, and has advocated a more direct approach on issues of sexuality and equality. That doesn’t make her a good leader. Other attributes are necessary to tick all the boxes in the leadership stakes.

To be honest I have never been a great fan of the leadership as a discipline in its own right brigade. Leadership to me is a subset of effective management. To take it away from management suggests that it is the preserve of a select few, an elite, and this propagates the view that leaders are born and not made. Leadership has a set of skills that can be learned and with practice true leadership results. Some of the hallmarks of good leadership are:

  • Humility – knowing when to take your foot off the pedal of self-promotion and narcissism;
  • Listening – to get advice and to shape this into the way you behave;
  • Followership – if you were never a good follower at some stage what insights do you have over your dominions?
  • Broad Shoulders – if you put yourself in front you need to be prepared to take on board the slings and arrows of criticism and to handle this with grace. People who do not agree with you aren’t necessarily stupid;
  • Being an example – knowing that people are watching means you have to do right and to be seen to do right; a plain fact so many in Office get wrong;
  • Sticking around – people want to see you there through thick and thin. If you bail out and move on then people do not get exposed to the true you;
  • Vulnerability – no-one is full proof and no-one is the complete person so showing the areas where you are not strong but get the necessary assistance to cover for this deficit provides comfort to those who follow you. This is not a prophet we follow after all; it is a human being;
  • Insight – you need to understand the power of your words and actions over those who have vested in you their hopes and aspirations;
  • Authenticity – if you cannot show the true you the audience for your ideas or leadership will spot it pretty easily and your following may well be based on fear and not a genuine desire to be led.

Neither Trump nor Madonna appear to display many of these characteristics. When Trump talks about people who decry his campaign he labels them, especially female reporters, as idiots and advocates they get beaten up. His rival Marco Rubio was ‘Little Marco’ in some strange reference to his genitalia. Last night Madonna made reference to genitalia on a number of occasions and also suggested that the audience should fight for the bouquet she was about to throw into the audience and that the person who got it should be punched in the nose.

Like and respect are the two emotions that followers afford their leaders. Neither I would give to either. Surely they know the impact of what they say? If not it is the responsibility of those around them to provide wise counsel. Blind adoration is not what we do when we anoint a leader. I suspect that Trump and Madonna wouldn’t be happy knowing this. When the Primaries get to the later stages where it really matters I don’t think the chorus in Cleveland are going to be singing to Donald ‘We’re Crazy for You!’ If upbraided for being late at concerts Madonna may well regale us with ‘Papa don’t preach.’ Here’s my response from a one-time admirer. ‘I’ve been losing sleep!”

 

 

The F Words

10 Thursday Mar 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Angela Merkel;, Aretha Franklin;, Carole King;, Carole King; Aretha Franklin;, Caroline Myss, Elaizabeth Warren;, fifty plus;, Germanine Greer;, Helen Mirren;, International Women's Day;, Judi Dench;, Katherine Gallagher;, Maria Abramovic;, Mary Robinson;

fifty-plus-brand-logo.jpg

Female, Fifty-plus and Fabulous

I was driving to work one morning listening to the Radio and the Treasurer at the time (Joe Hockey) was on talking about a Government initiative to incentivise employers to take on older persons. I nodded internally. We try to do the right thing where I work and I quickly put my mind to how we could make this a reality and if we employed a woman to boot we could kill two birds with the one proverbial stone (puns not intended of course). Next thing I almost drove off the road with the startling announcement that the incentive would only get paid for workers over the age of 50! WTF I’m 55.

International Women’s Day was this week and I recalled my near miss motor vehicle accident for some reason. As is the case with my blogs, that had me in reflective mode. I began to think about women that I admire over the age of 50 (outside of my own family of course). It’s a long list and to whittle it down to ten is a hard job. One might say you shouldn’t create such lists but how else do you get to put up front women that are extraordinary? It’s not a top ten, just ten I think would grace any situation be it a dinner party, or as a Director on a Board. If by chance some names are new to you, I recommend you seek them out and they may enliven you in the way that they continue to do so for me.

Maria Abramovic 

The Artist is Present Marina Abramovic MoMA - New York

 Born in Serbia but working out of the US she is known as the grandmother of performance art (presumably a compliment and not a reference to her age). To see her is compelling and people do by the hordes in the same way they flock to see the Mona Lisa. Perhaps her most famous work is The Artist is Present (MOMA in New York in 2010) where she just sat at a table staring at the people who queued to join her one by one. Watching paint dry right? For some strange reason, no, which is her gift. Check her out on You Tube.

Helen Mirren

Helen mirren

 

Actually I really want to put  Judi Dench in here as well. Both actresses who have been at the top of their game both on screen and stage. Self-effacing, wonderful senses of humour and an innate sexiness that belies age. Where Hollywood generally dispenses with you after around age 35 (if you are a woman) these two have totally dispelled the myth that they can’t sell seats with an old sheila. Quoted recently in an interview Mirren was asked what advice her older self would give to her younger self. Without the bat of an eye she said ‘I would say fuck off more often’. Sassy!

Germaine Greer 

germaine-greer-1200x630-1406757088

Funny, smart, irreverent and Australian. One of the leading lights of modern feminism she has plied her trade in the UK for many years. Perhaps not widely appreciated outside of the UK but her socio-political-art commentary is always arousing and often very pithy. Never afraid to share her opinion she is still a great role model for young women.

Carole King 

carole king

I was watching Jools Holland on Later the other night and Carole King performed a couple of songs. All the other musicians just stood and admired a master at work. I forget the statistics but her Tapestry album was owned by something like 1 in 2 households in America. Her live sessions at the Troubadour with James Taylor are now stuff of legend and I am fortunate to have seen them perform together. Her voice is still amazing with a patina from aging that just brings more textures and emotion to the words and music.

Katherine Gallagher

katherine gallagher

Some would argue Australia’s greatest living poet she resides in the UK. Her poems have a blend of 1960s syntax a la O’Hara and Ginsberg but she can also write in a more Victorian or romantic style where the pastoral and nostalgic images of her upbringing are brought to you from the page smelling fresh as newly cut grass. She is also a nice person and the email exchanges, letters and signed book shared between her and my son when he did a Year 12 assignment on her poetry are now a cherished part of our family archive.

Caroline Myss  

cmyss

Some people talk for five minutes and you are already tried of them. I went to a seminar with Caroline Myss and she talked for 7 hours and when she stopped I felt like it was just a starter and the main and desert were still to come. To hold an audience in a thrall is a rare gift and it is on the nature of gifts that Caroline talks. Her specialty is in the area of healing and soul and is a multi-million bestseller whose insights have helped many thousands of people. She is respected in the medical field (by hard-nosed ‘show me the proof’ MDs) for her ability to heal those for whom Western medicine does not seem to work.

Angela Merkel 

angela-merkel

If power is sexy then Merkel, not Beyonce, is the sexiest woman in the world. Long-standing Chancellor of a united Germany she hails from the old East and has managed Europe’s most economically powerful nation with aplomb through a time of great upheaval including the GFC and the refugee crisis, two issues that scuppered many a government. If she can just oversee the das auto fiasco to protect brand Germany then she will be remembered as one of the great European leaders of any generation.

Mary Robinson

mr

My heritage is Irish, a matriarchal society, so it is important to have an Irish woman in the mix and Mary Robinson is a great candidate who stands in her own stead. The first President of Ireland for 7 years from 1990 she moved to become the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights until 2002. Her life has been dedicated in the pursuit of advancing human rights especially for women. She remains passionate about climate change, ethical globalisation and women in leadership and is the founding member and Chair of the Council of Women World Leaders.

Elizabeth Warren

2014Warren2-1

 

What I like about Elizabeth Warren, US Senator from Massachusetts, is that she isn’t afraid to call out something for what it is. Her ability to laser in on waffle and obfuscation and get to the underlying truth is a sight to behold and a rare gift. Watching her in a gentle but prodding way unpeel an onion, for whom the only eyes watering are the people being questioned, is a lesson in how to forensically get to the kernel of a problem without braggadocio or grandstanding. Whip crack smart it’s a pity she didn’t choose to put herself forward as the Democrat candidate in the US Presidential race.

 Aretha Franklin

aretha-franklin

 

Put simply the greatest female singer of all time. I have often thought about writing to concert promoters in Australia imploring them to encourage Aretha to tour here. Her shows would sell out in a femtosecond (10−15 of a second). Her recent rendition of the Carole King (also in this list) song (You Make Me Feel) Like a Natural Woman celebrating her body of work, brought President Obama to tears. I defy anyone to watch the video clip and not feel goose bumps as this 73 year old belts out the song and makes it feel as fresh as it ever was…perhaps the best version ever. The shrugging off of the fur coat part way through the performance is pure genius and totally uncontrived. The likes of her we will never see again.

Looking back on this list I’m pretty happy with it. If they all turned up for dinner one night I would be delighted. If they appeared on the Board on an ASX 100 listed company in Australia I’d buy shares immediately. There is so much talk about leadership nowadays and each one in this list is a great leader. There is something more though, there is longevity. Leadership tests the input measure of certain skill sets. Longevity tests outcomes. As I’m often quoted as saying ‘don’t strive to be the best strive to be the longest’. These women have even transcended this to greatness. Age is no boundary to achievement – these women prove this. Now it’s over to employers to flirt with the notion of fifty-plus!

 

What Channel Can I Watch Schism On?

04 Friday Mar 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

24/7 news cycle, Chrsitopher Hitchens, Clinton, Democrat v Republican, Diversity, DNA, expert, expert panels, experts, Fox News, Lingua Franca, Lucy Kellaway, Richard Dawkins, Schism, Sky, sound bite, telly, tolerance, Trmp, Trump v Clinton, TV

fox-news-cashin-in

When I don’t get enough sleep I find myself the next day in meetings using big words, sometimes without being entirely sure whether they are being used in the right context. An example this week was when I was making a point about us all needing to agree and understand one another and I surprised myself by saying we need a ‘lingua franca’. I’d like to put this down to an amazing IQ but actually we grew up in a family without television. At the time I thought my parents were Luddites. Now I think of them as really radical. To keep ourselves occupied we read books and listened to the wireless. You are entirely wasting your time talking Hogan’s Heroes or Gilligan’s Island with me. Want to talk the Goon Show though – that’s a whole different kettle of fish.

I love the term ‘lingua franca’ – it sounds like you are smart when you say it and it rolls in the mouth like a melting lolly. That got me in reflective mode. We actually do need a lingua franca in business and in the world at the moment. I think many manager’s agree. Where the disagreement is, much to the chagrin of Lucy Kellaway (of AFR and Financial Times fame), in what form this common language should be. At times I despair when it clichéd and vacuous words that are trotted out masking true authenticity. More despairingly I find they slip into my vernacular from time to time.

The world it seems right now is desperately in need of a lingua franca. We desperately need understanding, harmony, forgiveness and peace. The world’s a mess and it’s getting messier. Possibly because I’m betting older and view it through a different prism, but we are getting more and more divided. Whereas once we might look for what unites (a kind of lingua franca) now we seem to focus with laser precision on what separates. Let me give you a list of some of the real areas of disagreement which I think are becoming deep-seated fissures or schisms in society today.

  • The rich v the poor (or as I have heard it referred to as the haves and have yachts);
  • Moderates v Hardliners in the recent elections in Iran for example;
  • North Korea v South Korea;
  • Sunni v Shia;
  • Ideologue v pragmatist;
  • Conservative v progressive;
  • Pro-life v women’s choice;
  • Nerd v hipster;
  • Muslim v kufir/infidel;
  • Science v intuition;
  • Religion v atheism;
  • Evolutionists v creationists;
  • Republicans v Democrats;
  • Pro v anti-gay marriage;
  • Greenie v climate change denier;
  • Japan v Sea Shepherd; and
  • Union v Employer.

And the list goes on….you get the picture.

What is the reason for this ever widening gap? For me it’s a growing intolerance arising from an arrogance in one’s own deeply help position or conviction. And I partly blame TV for that. Secondarily I blame the world of academia and the increased specialisation of knowledge. Whereas once upon a time you might see an eye specialist for a problem with your eyes, nowadays the specialist may only be a specialist in 2mm of a certain part of your retina. Let me draw these threads together. The 24/7 news cycle exists on a diet of:

  • breaking news e.g. bomb blast in Yemen kills 50 people;
  • in depth reporting from a war zone e.g. background piece on the devastation caused by bombing in Sanaa;
  • updates; e.g. reporter to reporter update e.g. ceasefire talks with anchor interviewing in situ or imbedded reporter
  • analysis where the anchor speaks to an expert; and
  • panel discussion where a panel of experts, most often moderated by a journalist, discusses an issue.

It is the last two I believe are causing the problem. It is critical for the news services that the ‘expert’ they have on has the gravitas to carry the day. They have to have a body of knowledge and be recognised for their background, expertise and experience in the field of discussion. When the viewer ascribes this ‘expert’ status upon them the news service has its credibility boosted off the back of this. It’s a symbiotic relationship. We, the public, then get ‘educated’ in the issue and form an opinion. We know from the world of psychology that once this perspective has been imprinted it becomes very difficult to subsequently disabuse the person of their first formed beliefs even if fixed from a soundbite interview.

The Archbishop of Cantebury Rowan Williams and atheist scholar Richard Dawkins pose for a photograph outside Clarendon House at Oxford University

 

Those who have read/watched any Christopher Hitchens (God is Not Great) or read/watched Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion) will appreciate how what should be polite disagreement between people about the existence of God, is a highly volatile and emotionally charged diatribe where the views of one party are forced down the throat of the other. It’s as though where reason cannot prevail brute force of argument might. It seems contradictory to me that the religious who believe in peace and ‘turning the other cheek’ engage in such nonsense and the atheists with their humanist underpinnings also engage in the very same thing.

Climate change is another issue where the degree of intolerance between parties of differently held beliefs is ever widening. Tolerance is going out the window as each diametrically opposed group, with wild overtones of exasperation and disbelief, throw rocks at each other. No-where is this seen more frequently than on TV between acknowledged (or perhaps more correctly alleged) experts. The frisson required to keep viewers almost always requires a diametrically opposed couple or group of experts. Not only does this make for titillating TV but it can be disguised under the pretence of providing balance.

In life, as in management, we mimic and mirror behaviours. If the so-called experts are at each other’s throats then what’s wrong with us doing this? The strident nature of the arguments presented get internalised and memorized because just parroting back the argument (in all its sound-bite beauty) is a lot easier than using Google or a library to do further research. Sure, use the interview to posit a hypothesis, but we should at least get off the couch and prove or disprove it with research, reflection and intuition. That’s the first thing. The second important point is that the experts despite seemingly being ‘experts’ may not be what they say. Being on TV does not afford them any extra credibility than seeing a product with the ‘As seen on TV” label on the box. The age-old adage of ‘just because they say it’s so doesn’t mean it is so’ holds up against the test of time.

I always reflect that these panellists, or experts, are often referred to as commentators. When listening to horse racing commentators as a child I was sure that who they said came first, second and third was almost always right, except when it was a photo finish and sometimes, not often, the horse they called first did not get the Stewards’ nod. So it is with current affairs commentators. They are opinion expressers with some background in the issues at best. With so many of them out there they often will raise their voices to get heard. When on a panel, especially on Fox (Sky) this seems to come to the fore more often than not.

turnbull_shorten

It doesn’t have to be like this. Just imagine a panel discussion where each panellist quietly and politely disagreed with the other party and then each started talking using a lingua franca on the issues upon which they do agree. Probably wouldn’t get great ratings though. With looming elections in the US with the deeply divisive Trump and Clinton we can expect a diet of raucous and irrational expert panels. With an election looming in Australia we can regrettably expect the same.

It’s important we find common ground in life and especially in the workplace. Diversity is an important aspect of a balanced organisation and this means hiring people of differing views. The respectful acknowledgement of others’ views to create overall harmony is important too. This is where for many young adults they learn their first lessons in tolerance. At school if you don’t agree with someone you drift to a different social group – normally one that is aligned to your perspective. The need to maintain employment and income is often a driver to keep people in the workplace where they are not entirely aligned to the prevailing views. To make this work the members within that organisation need to be tolerant and reach out and connect on the issues they have in common.

When we think about it we have so much more in common than the things we don’t agree on. Our DNA sees to that as Dawkins would say. Let’s look to those things that bind us and that we can agree on…hey everyone what’s on telly tonight?

Recent Posts

  • Happiness Can’t Buy Healthy!
  • Self-improvement is all the rage!
  • You Snooze…you win!
  • What’s In a Number?
  • Big Pharma – it’s time to cook!

Recent Comments

Your SCHEEME is Rad… on Your SCHEEME is Rad Man
joshymaters on Mystics and Statistics on the…
joshymaters on The Match Before the Matc…
Cool Offices | Const… on Cool Offices

Archives

  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • communications
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • Happiness Can’t Buy Healthy!
  • Self-improvement is all the rage!
  • You Snooze…you win!
  • What’s In a Number?
  • Big Pharma – it’s time to cook!

Recent Comments

Your SCHEEME is Rad… on Your SCHEEME is Rad Man
joshymaters on Mystics and Statistics on the…
joshymaters on The Match Before the Matc…
Cool Offices | Const… on Cool Offices

Archives

  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • communications
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • Happiness Can’t Buy Healthy!
  • Self-improvement is all the rage!
  • You Snooze…you win!
  • What’s In a Number?
  • Big Pharma – it’s time to cook!

Recent Comments

Your SCHEEME is Rad… on Your SCHEEME is Rad Man
joshymaters on Mystics and Statistics on the…
joshymaters on The Match Before the Matc…
Cool Offices | Const… on Cool Offices

Archives

  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • communications
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • burningmanagementblog
    • Join 27 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • burningmanagementblog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...