• About

burningmanagementblog

~ Life imitates management..management imitates life

burningmanagementblog

Tag Archives: Netflix;

Downsizing Tips for the Moarder

13 Friday Jan 2017

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

declutter, down-sizing, Ikea, life-editing, McMansion, Netflix;, Office Works, pinot noir, Reidel, The Minimalists

1467147464134

January is the time I declutter my office. Well I try anyway. I never quite get pared back to where I think I should be because I get distracted or my initial resolve fades and the ‘definitely discard’ pile gets iterated into a ‘maybe I will need one day’ pile. At home I’m a little less dedicated. Decluttering or life-editing is something I’ve strongly resisted on the domestic front. I’m a hoarder by nature (I think a lot of men are). We are hunters and collectors after all and I think I’m endowed pretty heavily with the gather gene. So I have developed a new word – ‘moarder’ meaning man-hoarder because, let’s face it, we do that best – just check our sheds out.

 

riedel-backyard

But a couple of things happened over the break that have made me rethink (at least) my approach to my hoarding. Firstly I was in Trade Secrets (a discount shop) with my wife who was returning an item. She is the pantheon of the declutter class by the way. Whilst waiting for her I did a browse and found to my apparent delight some discounted Reidel Pinot Noir glasses. For those who don’t know, Reidel is an Austrian glass company renowned for their wine glasses particularly a different shaped glass for each major wine variety. I had to have them and was delighted to get them home. Then the ‘road to Damascus’ moment. In order to put them in the wine glass cupboard I had to remove some other, quite adequate by the look of it, wine glasses. Not sure how much they cost but they are now being recycled presumably somewhere in Queensland. I clearly didn’t need new glassware and this thought sprung to mind. But then again, drinking out of the fit for purpose glasses when I quaff my Pinot Noir is a little luxury that I can afford and ‘why not’ was my defence response. Then my second ‘Damascus’ moment. I don’t drink Pinot Noir, nor any other red wine for that matter and barely ever white wine. For some reason my deeply seated ‘need’ for these glasses overrode my common sense. In neuroscience terms that is possibly mimetic desire. I wanted the glasses because somewhere along the way I have likely seen someone else with them. In sociological terms it is the paradox of affluence. From a philosophical perspective Aristotle wrote. ‘It is of the nature of desire not to be satisfied and most men only live for the gratification of it.’

Then I sat to watch Netflix, without any alcoholic accompaniment I have to say. I surfed what was on and saw that Netflix, rather obtusely or quite spookily (you choose), had recommended me a doco called The Minimalists about the need to declutter and downsize our lives. Wow it made sense. It was hard viewing though given I have a ‘collection’ of newspapers in the garage from some of the key moments in history, most of which I have never re-visited. That got me thinking as to why we collect and how much this fascination with stuff detracts from the simplicity of life and being in the now. This applies equally I think to both home and work.

scatter-cushions-home

Architecture has assisted us of a hoarding bent there is no doubt. As our McMansions have increased in size so has the much-needed storage space to fill with our stuff. Watch ‘The Block’ and the contestants who build in more storage than the other contestants seem to get more points. Every room in the house seems to have got bigger which means you can now no longer just relax on the couch because the couch is a behemoth capable of seating a small politburo. It is so vast it looks like a wasteland without the requisite cushions which have to be aligned – just so- to create the right balance of colour interplay and pleasing but not matching patterns. In my Mum’s day, that cushion would have to last many years and it would. Nowadays it’s lucky to last a season as we have introduced the notion of ‘fashion’ to lots of stuff outside just clothing. If that is ‘last year’s colours’ it has to go. The quality of build nowadays is so good we don’t keep hold of something until its broken, we let it go (or to the spare bedroom in my case) when a more fashionable or feature-laden model gets released. For the likes of me this puts me further into the hoarder spiral. Fashionable shapes and colours have been introduced to toasters, kettles, mixers you name it. This doesn’t only permeate our home lives it has leeched into work as well. Any trip around Ikea or Office Works will bear out the fact that folders, in trays, pen holders etc. now come in a range of fancy colours; bright and bold one year, muted and pastel the next.

null

The office environment has much to make up in this regard fortunately. Conversely the world of work is much more advanced in downsizing. This hasn’t come about as a result of a minimalist or life-editing mindset, but rather costs. The days of the big offices for senior and middle management are now long gone. We laud the funky shared spaces in modern office buildings but who are we kidding? It’s driven by cost per square metre and not about food for the soul. It’s hard to create a sense of belonging in a corporate setting when you can sit somewhere where your sense of connection to that place lasts as long as your shift, especially if you are late for work next day. The magnetic board for a temporary placement of family or pet photo to try and personalise it doesn’t really cut it. That’s what our PC/laptop desktops are for. That’s what the pastel range of storage accessories at Office Works are for, except they all look the same.

b4457c7a6a02cf4cd188b402b8494844
60050f77400b67fd2d5e6658cb3e1efc

Since the advent of the ‘way to work coffee’- delivered the form of a paper cup – even coffee/tea mugs, once highly individualized in their day, seem to have disappeared from the office altogether. They used to be a sure-fire way of summing up new work colleagues – just looking at what their treasured coffee mug spoke in large measure about what sort of person they were. A porcelain meme! Nowadays it can take much longer to know your fellow employees because you are seldom located in the same place twice.

So, on balance, I would recommend we de-clutter our domestic lives of things and downsize as much as we can, but upsize on time spent with friends and family, hobbies and being with ourselves in the moment. On the work front we should downsize from our engagement with 24/7 email and the work server. In terms of space and stuff I think there is an argument for some sensible upsizing and for a few more personal ‘things’ around us. There are those in my office reading this who will go ‘…how convenient. His wife thinks he’s thrown stuff out and he’s just brought it into work!’ That’s true I did bring some unwanted red wine in to share with the team. Now where are those Pinot Noir glasses when I need them?

Driven to Distraction by the Driverless Car

09 Friday Sep 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Apple TV, autonobabble, BATNA, Blu Ray, CAPEX, Casio, Concorde, Digital watch, Dr Hugh Bradlow, driverless car, driverless cars, Maryanne Wolf, Max Bazerman, Moore's Law, Netflix;, OPEX, psycho motor skills, Richard Denniss, Telstra, Texas Instruments, The Australia Institute, Tufts University, Video Ezy

_73363361_genevaxc_24_dwn_20_2014_hres

I went to a politics in the pub session with Richard Denniss last night. He’s the Chief Economist with The Australia Institute. He has coined a phrase called ‘econobabble’ to explain how the use of economic terminology and jargon by non-economists is designed to stifle the debate and belittle the audience. I am going to coin my own phrase ‘Autonobabble’. I define this as the use of putative assertion and poorly conceived rhetoric to predict the bleak future of the world through the relentless advance of automation.

The recent hype behind the driverless car has me perplexed. Recently Dr Hugh Bradlow, Chief Scientist for Telstra, was on the radio making the prediction that by 2030 the road will be almost entirely occupied by driverless vehicles. Ironic I thought in the very same month that Telstra’s system crashed due to IT failures requiring a pretty significant mea culpa and compensation payment to customers. I also thought what greater insight into driverless cars does a telecoms company have over the usual Joe or Joeanne in the street? When we hear future predictions with no counter-balance I begin to smell vested interest. Let’s look at driverless cars then in greater detail.

There are a number of rationales being used by the short-term futurists predicting the rapid uptake of driverless vehicles. These include:

  • Moore’s Law. If we think of the driverless vehicle less as a car and more as a computer the computational advancements will be rapid over the next ten years. Can’t argue with that;
  • Insurers will drive this change as we will be so much safer in driverless vehicles given human error is the largest contributor to motor vehicle accidents by a long chalk. True;
  • People don’t want to have such big CAPEX sitting idle for the largest portion of its life at home or at work. Kinda but does everyone have that old CAPEX v OPEX conundrum whistling around in their head all the time? and
  • Everything’s going digital right? Keep reading….

I’m not so convinced that driverless cars are going to catch on at the speed that is being predicted or if they do that it will necessarily be a good thing. The trajectory for driverless vehicles and the predicted uptake is based on a number of myths which need to be called out.

patek_image_2857408
0tilurz

Myth One. Everything is going digital. I recall many years ago going to a training session where the trainer got us all to work on a Harvard Business School Case Study on the demise or near demise of the Swiss watch industry. It was being disrupted by the digital watch with the advent of the quartz mechanism which was actually invented by the Swiss watch people and given away to Casio  and Texas Instruments because they couldn’t see any use for it. As they say the rest is history. Sounds like Kodak – yes? Well no actually. A watch is way more than a means by which to tell the time. It is jewellery on your wrist – an emotional purchase and guess what happened? Swiss watches fought back and now you are hard pressed to find a digital watch. New generation Apple and Samsung watches are really just backlit analogue timepieces.

This drive to digital isn’t always a good thing. Maryanne Wolf of Tufts University believes that there are intrinsic dangers in giving ipads to children. This belief that we are creating digital natives is just that – a myth. What it is in fact doing is stunting children’s memory, ability to read, concentration and overall cognition. And we are led to believe it’s a good thing because a one year old can swipe an ipdad screen. Wolf believes ipads should be banned outright for children. But we’re not talking about kids we are talking about adults in cars right?

Think again. Psycho-motor skills are important. Driving remains one of the last great psycho-motor challenges left to humans. Remember learning to drive a manual vehicle and doing all those things simultaneously? We had to master a multi-faceted task. With the other psycho-motor skills dulled over the years e.g. we no longer need such dexterity to hunt, cook, or build, we need to retain some tasks that engage us fully. Driving involves many of the senses at once and cognitively engages us from situational awareness, memory, hand-eye co-ordination, thinking ahead, planning, judgement, risk assessment, emotion control etc. There is also the issue of ophthalmic health. Driving a car requires us to exercise eye muscles and look into the distance then quickly change our focal point. It’s highly likely the driverless car experience will involve looking at a screen loaded with some form of entertainment or news once again adding to the visual stimuli at a focal range that human’s were not evolved for. Did you know that our mental wellbeing partly requires us to look to the horizon from time to time to build comfort? Did you know that optometrists are finding ocular health in rapid decline in children equivalent to the decline seen in previous generations of elderly people? Driving a car keeps cognitive and ocular health in good shape. Very little in the way of cognition or psycho-motor skills will be enagegd when Elon Musk’s car pulls up at your door for your commute to work.

dish_blockbuster_store_closings-00bfa

Myth Two – the technology is ready. My Video Ezy closed about a year ago. Shame really as I supported it to the end. Sure Apple TV gave me online access to rentable movies plus I could get rubbish movies for free on Netflix. I stuck with my local Video Ezy partly out of loyalty but also because of the social interaction I had with the owner. I got to know her really well over the years and knowing of my penchant for foreign movies she used to stock world cinema almost just for me with little prospect of making much a return from those titles. That builds loyalty. Try getting foreign movies on Apple TV. I haven’t watched a decent foreign film in ages. Even if I did want to watch the trash that Apple TV offers I have to wait anything from 1-5 hours for the movie to download at a cost of about double the face to face hire cost. The technology just can’t match a good Blu Ray pick up from a local video store. Just like internet 1.0 the hype of its possibility outstripped its ability to deliver.

Myth Three – It’s Cheaper. No-one wants to have their CAPEX sitting idle for most of its useful life do they? Better to have it working for you – that’s the basis of collaborative consumption. Let’s think this through. What will be the cost of the OPEX to get the driverless vehicle to your place every day so you can have the equivalent access as having a car at your fingertips (your own)? No-one really knows. Think about this for a moment. Governments need to tax us to pay for the roads hospitals, schools etc. Governments need to repay national debt currently at levels that would make your eyes water. Governments don’t want to raise your personal taxes because it gets them voted out. Politics 101 when in government says always put someone between you and the shit. Imagine the sucker punch of being able to raise costs/taxes/levies that have to be absorbed by a middle entity who then passes them on to the consumer (the person who orders the driverless car). No direct attribution back to the government…sweet!

The calculation that people will have to make is will they pay more ultimately. The CAPEX route to car availability at least gives the consumer certainty over the largest component of the expenditure. To lose an alternative (i.e. to have no BATNA as Bazerman might describe it) is to place you in a very weak position in any negotiation around service. Try ordering a driverless vehicle at peak hour – you might find the cost out of your comfort zone. We see electricity costs rising every year when one is promised that competition will do the opposite. Driverless cars might find us beholden to service providers in ways we would prefer not to be.

turntable

Myth Four – Everyone Will Want To Use One. The largest sales in music today are albums. Why? Because the digitisation and compression of music has taken the soul out of it. It just sounds better in analogue. Dust off your old albums put them on a turntable and turn up the sound. You know I’m right. But does this example hold true for motor vehicles? Well yes and no. Would I prefer to drive myself or be in a driverless car to and from work each day? The latter if myth three is within reasonable bounds. But in the weekend the thought of using my iphone to request a driverless vehicle to take a nice drive up the Coast leaves me cold. There is a romance to driving that will never be delivered without someone in the driver’s seat actually driving. If we go driverless then all motorsport will go by the wayside shortly after. Motorsport is popular because it is the ultimate fantasy of driving at the very extreme of person and machine. If the psychomotor experience of cars is taken away then we won’t be able to contextualise the racing driver experience. Out go the weekend car and bike warriors and anyone who has a classic or vintage car will find their hobby quickly curtailed. Out go the petrol heads in come the propeller heads. For many there is an emotional component to driving (like a watch in many ways). Just because an idea seems like a good one to the marketing department doesn’t mean it is so.

Look how far we have come. Watson is now doing cognition computing, social media is revolutionising communication, there is the internet of things, automation and robotics are already changing our workplaces, wi fi is ubiquitous, cloud computing allows big data to know everything about us, mobile phone ownership internationally is of staggering proportions even in countries once considered ravaged by chronic long-term poverty. Strong arguments indeed upon which to base a 2030 driverless vehicle prediction. Pause though and reflect. We landed a man on the moon in 1969, and have barely left the earth’s orbit since. We had the first supersonic aircraft (Concorde) in 1976 retiring in 2003. We haven’t done supersonic flight since. Driverless cars are coming but not as fast as we are being led to believe. So pause next time you are cut off on the road and think is it worth giving the finger to a driverless vehicle? Not much satisfaction in that. So all this talk about the demise of the driver operated vehicle…not so much hot air as autonobabble!

Diving Deep into Working Hours

29 Friday Apr 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

C. Northcote Parkinson, DCNS, Final Gifts, Fortune, Fortune magazine, J L Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Kellogg, Kellogg School, Netflix;, Parkinson's Law, Pierre Casse, South Australia, work-life balance

scorpene-c-dcns-slideshowWith a Government sliding in the polls based on the perception that they are doing nothing, there have been a slew of announcements this week. One that particularly took my eye was the awarding of the building of 12 new submarines for Australia to the French Government owned DCNS at an estimated cost of $50bn. They are going to be built with Australian steel, Australian jobs and most importantly by Australian workers.

Without revealing my sources I have come across a schematic of the new submarine. Probably highly classified I feel justified in leaking it (should we talk about leaking when referring to a sub?).

sub2

The sharp of eye among you will spot the obvious and reductionist cultural stereotyping that I have humorously deployed (ok I’m trying to get a few defence terms in here and there). While doctoring the drawing I recalled my time at Business School in the US. We were given a couple of lectures by a visiting professor from the French business school IAE, Pierre Casse. Casse is now Dean Emeritus at the Berlin School of Creative Leadership so he is still regarded as a thought leader in the area of cultural differences. His lecture though went down like a lead weight. At the coffee break between his two sessions the overwhelming consensus was ‘how dare this upstart Frenchman (actually he’s Belgium) come over here and tell us how we should conduct our lives, especially given the Europeans lazy attitude to work.’ By the end of the second lecture most of us had ‘got it.’

pierre_casse

Casse was telling us that we need to learn from the European’s attitude to their work which embraces family and leisure time in a much more conscious way. This is often characterised by the European penchant for dining and enjoying good food and wine. Too often, it would appear, our own attitude to food is to refuel to get ourselves back to work, or to get pissed as quick as we can so we can enjoy our night out. Some things the Europeans just get. It’s been too easy to look down our nose at the flailing Greek economy or the amateurish Belgium counter-terrorism.

The implication, of course, of work-life balance is that there is always a trade-off. Sure the Europeans can enjoy their short work weeks and long holidays but that means they are not very productive and what they produce is low spec anyway – their scientists are too busy enjoying the bon vivant of Parisian bars.

So it is a bit of a shock for some to discover that the French won the submarine design and build bid out-gunning the hard-working Japanese and more industrious Germans. Even harder to swallow must be the fact that the French – so preoccupied in their endeavours to get a work-life balance – can build the submarine cheaper and in less time than our own smart, hard-working South Australians much vaunted in the country for their industrial prowess. What’s more DCNS is some lazy old government-owned enterprise. Sacré bleu!

I can’t recommend highly enough Callahan and Kelley’s book Final Gifts: Understanding the Special Awareness, Needs and Communications of the Dying. Far from depressing it is an uplifting book with much wisdom to share. I cannot recall any mention within its 256 pages of a dying patient reflecting and regretting they didn’t spend more time at work. And yet we continue, in Australia, to work longer and harder. The technological aids that have enabled us to enjoy our leisure time e.g. an ipad to watch Netflix, simultaneously becomes a really easy interface device for typing out substantial emails or reports. We seem too willing or too pressured into the latter over the former.

Fortune magazine ranked 36 countries for average hours worked and Australia was 25th highest at 32 hours per week compared to France at 28.33. (This includes full-time and part-time workers). Suffice to say the laid-back Australian way of life does not prove factually correct when we analyse the hours we actually work. Herein lies the enigma though. With the French working on average fewer hours they appear to be able to put a high-tech submarine together quicker and cheaper than what we can.

frases-de-cyril-northcote-parkinson

Perhaps then, and I’m speculating here, it comes down to how we spend our working hours rather than the hours made available to us to work. In a spooky quirk of circumstance here I turn to British naval historian C Northcote Parkinson to explain. In his infamous text Parkinson’s Law he espoused that work expands so as to fill the time available for its completion. Perhaps if we paid the workers in South Australia the same amount of money for building the submarines but gave them fewer hours to do so we could get our submarines quicker and as a result cheaper. Sounds illogical but I think management theory backs this suggestion.

Next time you are out at a French restaurant or quaffing a lovely Burgundy just reflect that the nation that spends so much of its time sitting in chic cafes watching the world pass by is the ultimate designer of our coastal defence system. I’ll drink to that!

Killing Me Softly and Absolutely

24 Wednesday Feb 2016

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

absolutism, Antonin Scalia, art of compromise, authenticity, Brendan Dassey, compromise, Dolores Avery, Founding Fathers, hard is soft soft is hard, Making a Murderer, Manitowoc, Netflix;, Obama, Steven Avery, US Supreme Court, Wisconsin

 

Orange County News - Aug 29, 2005

Scalia: ‘Absolutely! What’s the question?’

My mind is still preoccupied with all things Stateside (as per my last blog about the US Primaries). Adding texture (as if it was needed) to the Primaries is the looming constitutional crisis of the replacement of recently deceased Antonin Scalia on the US Supreme Court. To those who are only occasional followers of the US Federal government system a quick rundown may be of value. There are basically four components, each designed specifically by the Founders to place a check on government to avoid abuse of power. The President is the Executive. While wielding a lot of power this is held in check by the other branches of Government e.g. Congress and the Supreme Court. Congress has two chambers being the House of Representatives and the Senate. To give an example of how the checks and balances work let’s consider the US going to war. Only the President, as Commander in Chief, can declare war but he needs Congress to vote the appropriations to fund it. The Supreme Court can rule on whether such action was unconstitutional and if so their decision becomes binding.

Why then am I focussing on this minutia of the US Supreme Court? Well for one the numbers are really important. There are nine judges in total so depending on the current set up you can have a liberal (by the numbers) court or a conservative one. This may be in accord or out of step with the political leanings of the executive. The death of Scalia, an arch conservative, means Obama has the opportunity to select his own (presumably liberal/progressive). This would mean for the first time in a long time that majority liberal decisions can be assumed more often than not. Nominations are fine but the candidate still needs Congress approval and that is where Obama may run out of time. The filibuster is very much part of the US political zeitgeist. This may well be a high risk strategy for the filibusters however because those seen obstructing a US President in the proper execution of his duties may well run foul of the voters in an election that also sees a number of Senators standing for re-election.

screen%20shot%202016-01-19%20at%201_17_04%20pm

Dolores Avery – Quite often on the other end when Steven was ‘phoning home’

I’m also into all things American at the moment because I am in the thrall of Making a Murderer currently playing on Netflix. For me this is the most compelling television since Breaking Bad and it’s a documentary to boot. If you haven’t seen it, it is worth the price of Netflix alone. Without giving too much away, the chief protagonist, Steven Avery, is twice convicted for two different crimes which he quite clearly did not commit. The Avery’s are ‘trailer trash’ and yet the manner in which they have conducted themselves throughout 10 or so hours of documentary footage is astounding. Their quiet dignity, especially that of the inimitable Dolores, is something that you just settle into and admire for it shows that class is no determinant of …errr…class.

[Look away now if you don’t want a spoiler].

Steven Avery – a redneck with a right to be hot under the collar

One particular aspect of the Steven Avery story has struck me. I’ll call it absolutism. At his second trial, when he is tried for a brutal murder and disposal of a corpse, one of the jurors had to be relieved of their duties for family illness. He later advised that on immediately retiring to the Jury room an initial straw poll of the jurors was taken. The results were seven not guilty and three guilty; with one undecided. The verdict brought down at the end was Avery guilty of murder. What this said to me was that the absolutists on the jury had prevailed. Those of a more flexible mindset were drawn across to the clearly nonsensical decision to pronounce a guilty verdict by the three unwilling to yield. This had me in reflection mode. What is it about the absolutists that make the pragmatists want to compromise? I also reflected on the absolutism underpinning the verdict which is the presumption that the State is both more credible and important than the individual. Surely this flies in the face of the structure of Government put in place by the Founding Fathers? This is something Justice Scalia would find deeply upsetting.

Yet there is probably no greater exponent of absolutism in modern times than Supreme Court Judge Scalia himself. Often the ‘swing voter’ on the Supreme Court he wrote many judgements and he is known for his very conservative and strict adherence to the principles laid out in the Constitution. He used as his guiding principles the Founding Fathers’ absolute intent. Seldom did he take into account we live in a different age; a different time. Consequently America has been held back in some areas e.g. stem cell research as a result. Not surprising he was pretty robust on the defence of the Second Amendment (the right to bear arms) costing how many lives we can never know.

This strict adherence to principles without the pragmatism to know when to be firm and when to be flexible strikes me as an individual who does not understand, or refuses to accept the beauty of compromise. Not compromise when you are not being authentic. Not compromise when it makes it feel like you are not living your truth. Not compromise where you feel you have given a little of your soul away in the process, or betraying yourself ( a la Caroline Myss). Rather, compromise where your mindfulness and emotional intelligence has recognised the face issues of the other party and acknowledged that victory at all costs is ultimately a shallow exercise. It’s called the ‘art of compromise’ for a reason. It needs real artistry to achieve i.e. creativity, nuance, style and sensitivity.

I’ve been a long time believer that there are many false truisms in life and management. One of the biggest I think is that acting without compromise is hard and compromising is easy. I call this ‘hard is soft; soft is hard’. Being unyielding is as easy as pie. You pull the shutters down and just dig in. It’s not about tenacity it’s more about tuning out. Compromise on the other hand is much more difficult. There is an intense vulnerability at play here. Knowing what to hold firm to and what to compromise on is really hard. Knowing that your colleagues might ridicule you for bending or folding is hard to do. It’s about strength of character. That might sound counter-intuitive but sometimes to display our vulnerability is the hardest thing of all. To do so is to be authentic. Authenticity is seldom detectable in the un-yielding. The absolutists don’t give us enough of an insight into their inner workings to allow us to properly ‘feel’ them. The unyielding wall that is their lack of compromise is a barrier behind which they hide and makes an emotionally intelligent exchange with them well-nigh impossible. It’s a black and white approach to life and work when in fact the continuum of black and white has all shades of grey in between. That’s why I believe it’s beholden on those professions that come from an absolutist tradition e.g. accountants, engineers etc. to learn the complexity of management and unlearn much of what their underpinning knowledge has taught them. It’s doubtful that they will come to this heuristically.

And so to the jurors in the Steven Avery case. The three -probably biased before the case- jurors who held out for the guilty verdict must have just stood their ground so firmly that the others found they inappropriately compromised their own beliefs for the sake of expediency. In such cases this is not an authentic compromise position. The lesson that Steven Avery lives to this very day in a Wisconsin prison is that absolutism cannot be applied absolutely. The problem is the absolutists have no idea about how to shift their paradigm.

Two things I hope we can look forward to in the not too distant future. Firstly a new Supreme Court judge who has the wisdom to guide the US in the decades that follow bringing down well-reasoned and compassionate rulings and secondly the exoneration and compensation of Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey for crimes they clearly did not commit. Of that I’m absolutely certain.

The Tesla: A Feat of Daredevil Do

15 Tuesday Dec 2015

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Australian Financial Review;, Daredevil, Eldon Musk, Environment, IP, Jeremy Clarkson, Jessica Jones, Master of None, Millenials, Model X, Netflix;, Prius, Tesla, Wilson Fisk, YouTube

section-hero-touch

I sat down to watch TV last night with my soon to be 19 year old son. The communication gap between baby boomer and millennial can sometimes be a wide one. To be honest there is very little in the way of taste in television we share in common. Invariably when I stumble across a series that we might both agree on he has watched it. Netflix has helped and he is able to steer me towards some shows of merit e.g. Marvel’s Jessica Jones or the comedy  Master of None. Too late sadly to watch together.

Last night was different though. We didn’t watch Netflix, we didn’t watch Foxtel and we didn’t watch terrestrial television. Instead we watched a thirty minute YouTube Clip together that we beamed via his MacBook onto our projector screen. In doing so we found a nexus between our love for technology and concern for the environment. Now a half hour YouTube about the environment doesn’t sound like a stimulating night’s viewing especially one might suspect for a 19 year old. Add to this the fact that it  was a product launch!

But it was riveting. It was Eldon Musk’s (of Tesla fame) launch of the new Model X transportation disruptor.  Far from a polished performer Musk takes you through the innovations that make the Tesla Model X such an inspiring design achievement. It challenges and often turns on its head the traditional approach to motor vehicles. No longer is the electric car the domain of the quirky and the environmental front-runners ( a la the Prius). Rather here is a vehicle that even Jeremy Clarkson may now want in his garage.

I was drawn to Musk in a piece I read in the Australian Financial Review about Tesla giving away their IP for their technology. Tesla spokeswoman Alexis Georgeson said recently.

“We released the Tesla Model S in June of 2012 and expected other manufacturers to create cars with similar performance and range, but nothing comparable came along,”

By releasing the patents, she said, Tesla hoped to spur consumer acceptance and even create a network of supporting businesses, like car charging stations and mechanics. Of course growing the pie, which IP sharing is likely to do, is good for Tesla. As Wilson Fisk says on Daredevil – currently playing on Netflix – we all rise with the tide. Regardless of some of the by-product benefits, the environment will end up thanking Musk and his associates. Finally our love affair with gas guzzling cars might be at an end. Car envy now is starting to focus on the unthinkable – a vehicle powered by a battery and not the internal combustion engine. Think about it…tomorrow’s young people tinkering about on cars may well be chemists rather than mechanics. Whatever happens, the future is looking a lot brighter than when the Prius was the only viable alternative.

It was a half hour of viewing to be savoured. Communicating meaningfully  across the generations is never easy. Finding common ground is one good way to start and maintain that engagement. I await Musk’s further Tesla product launchs for more than the obvious reasons.

War – What Is It Good For?

17 Tuesday Nov 2015

Posted by Burning Manager in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

AFR;, Art of War;, Australian Financial Review;, Beirut attack;, Deepak Chopra;, Edwin Starr;, Financial Times;, Lucy Kellaway, Motown;, Narcos;, Netflix;, Paris attack;, Paris killings;, Sun Tzu;, the Seven Spiritual Laws of Success;, war for talent;, war metaphor;, Whitfield and Strong;

war-what-is-it-good-fo

 

In 1970 Edwin Starr recorded a song written by Norman Whitfield and Barrett Strong that was produced on the Motown label. It was a protest song written about the Vietnam War and was a huge hit worldwide. Despite being released 45 years ago, when it is played it still seems to resonate, partly I guess because war is something that persists and its value is still questionable. In recent weeks we have seen the outrage that terror brings from the Beirut attacks, the downing of the Russian airliner in the Sinai, to the Paris killings. A not surprising response to that has been the declaration of War against the perpetrators. Whether this is necessarily a bad thing is much more in the realms of a military strategist (which I’m not) to determine.

Rather I want to talk about the over-use of the word ‘war’. When you over-use a word it takes the sting out of it. For example the ‘F’ bomb is now so frequently peppered into modern parlance that it’s shock value has diluted. We have the war on terror, the war on drugs, war on crime, war on cancer, the war on want, the war on poverty and the war for talent to name but a few. I suspect that the use of ‘war’ as a metaphor is deployed for a number of reasons:

  1. It suggests we’re really serious about things now. After all no-one goes to war lightly;
  2. It suggests a real sense of campaign and co-ordinated planning. No-one can win a war unless all military resources are effectively deployed;
  3. It also suggests casualties. In order to prevail, sacrifices will need to be made but the greater good is more important;
  4. It suggests an enemy with less moral authority than us (although they are saying the exact same thing on the other side).

So, straight away, the word ‘war’ starts to seem inadequate at best or inappropriate at worst in most situations. Take drugs for example. I’ve been watching the excellent Netflix series Narcos  and it is clear that the whole drug trade is a complex web of competing or coinciding interests and not as straight-forward as say fighting the Hun. Outside of the horror of a conventional battle between two nations (the true definition of war) everything gets a lot more fuzzy. The war on cancer is surely an oxymoron. To kill is the mechanism by which wars are won. The war on cancer is presumably to save lives. Same applies to want or poverty…indeed quite a lot of the want is a by-product of the various wars being raged from time to time be it in Africa or in the Middle-east at present.

The greatest ‘distortion’ of the word ‘war’ has to be the much used term now for getting and retaining your valuable staff. As if the words ‘attracting and retaining our valuable staff members’ is not emphatic enough, the phrase ‘the war for talent’ is being used in its place. It’s faddy, it’s inaccurate and it’s just plain wrong. As Lucy Kellaway in her recent column in the FT and AFR pointed out – where is the enemy? When I went to business school it was very trendy (and may still be) to quote Sun Tzu (The Art of War) as a short-cut solution to managerial problems. To confront and solve your managerial challenges armed with a copy of said tome is not that helpful. Let me quote.

‘The best leadership destroys the enemy’s plan.’  Not sure Harvard Business Review would concur and they bang on about leadership a lot.

‘Next best is to destroy their alliances.’ Once again not so sure. Maybe better to look at being smarter, leaner and more responsive.

‘After that comes the destruction of his army in the field.’ Hmmmmm.

‘Worst of all is to attack fortified cities.’ I’m with you there big fellah!

On first read that sounds like military strategy and not of great help to a manager, say, grappling with the reputational damage of a failed tailings dam in Brazil (a la BHP Billiton and Vale). It’s time we put the war books and war references down and looked to other avenues, softer ones perhaps, that  might speak to how we can get really good people to join us and then stay with us – once known euphemistically as the loyalty effect.

Of course being the ‘naysayer’ and the ‘anti-guy’ can always be seen as easy. My critics might pose a tougher question and demand that I come up with some suggestions of my own. So here goes. Let me play devil’s advocate and address some ‘War for Talent’ issues.

from The Art of War: ‘Train the people (talent). Discipline them (the talent). They (the talent) will submit.’ …awkward!

from The Seven Spiritual Laws of Success (Deepak Chopra):  ‘And when we realise that our true Self is one of pure potentiality, we align with the power that manifests everything in the universe.’

To offer the potential to truly grow and truly create has to be much more alluring than some borrowed and distorted tactics translated across from the theatres of war. Recent events have taught me one thing. We need to be kinder, gentler and more forgiving to ourselves, our  team members and our community because there is enough of the other stuff happening out there to go around without adding to the mix. Let’s end poverty and want, let’s cure cancer, let’s solve the drug scourge and let’s all get talented individuals to join our teams because we will support them, nourish them and sometimes even let them go to grow. The last thing anyone in their right mind would want to do is place them anywhere near a ‘war zone’ in whatever shape or form.

Recent Posts

  • Happiness Can’t Buy Healthy!
  • Self-improvement is all the rage!
  • You Snooze…you win!
  • What’s In a Number?
  • Big Pharma – it’s time to cook!

Recent Comments

Your SCHEEME is Rad… on Your SCHEEME is Rad Man
joshymaters on Mystics and Statistics on the…
joshymaters on The Match Before the Matc…
Cool Offices | Const… on Cool Offices

Archives

  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • communications
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • Happiness Can’t Buy Healthy!
  • Self-improvement is all the rage!
  • You Snooze…you win!
  • What’s In a Number?
  • Big Pharma – it’s time to cook!

Recent Comments

Your SCHEEME is Rad… on Your SCHEEME is Rad Man
joshymaters on Mystics and Statistics on the…
joshymaters on The Match Before the Matc…
Cool Offices | Const… on Cool Offices

Archives

  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • communications
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Recent Posts

  • Happiness Can’t Buy Healthy!
  • Self-improvement is all the rage!
  • You Snooze…you win!
  • What’s In a Number?
  • Big Pharma – it’s time to cook!

Recent Comments

Your SCHEEME is Rad… on Your SCHEEME is Rad Man
joshymaters on Mystics and Statistics on the…
joshymaters on The Match Before the Matc…
Cool Offices | Const… on Cool Offices

Archives

  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • November 2020
  • June 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014

Categories

  • communications
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • burningmanagementblog
    • Join 27 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • burningmanagementblog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...